A manual action
Disclosed to you in Search Console. Names its reason and its scope. Lifted by fixing the cause and asking a human to look again. Usually the result of something specific somebody did, often years ago and often not by you.
Start by finding out whether you have one, because most people searching this do not. Then fix the right thing. Both halves are written out below, free.
to check, in Search Console, under Security and Manual Actions.
A penalty is a manual action: a person at Google has reviewed your site and applied a suppression, and it is listed in Search Console. If Search Console says no issues detected, you do not have one. What you have is an algorithmic decline, which is a different problem with a different fix and no appeal, and selling penalty recovery for it is one of the most common things done to businesses in trouble.
Disclosed to you in Search Console. Names its reason and its scope. Lifted by fixing the cause and asking a human to look again. Usually the result of something specific somebody did, often years ago and often not by you.
Never announced and nowhere in Search Console. Nobody to appeal to. Recovered by making the pages genuinely better than the ones now above them, which takes a reassessment rather than an approval and has no timetable.
The most common by a distance. Links you paid for, traded, or bought in a package, usually years ago and often by somebody else. The fix is removal or disavowal of what you can identify, and an honest account of how it happened.
Selling links, or an affiliate section passing authority it should not. Usually fixed by adding the right rel attribute rather than by removing anything.
Doorway pages, scraped content, generated pages, a page per town with the name swapped. The fix is removing them, not improving them: a hundred thin pages rewritten is still a hundred pages nobody searched for.
Cloaking, scraped content at scale, automatically generated gibberish. Usually a compromised site rather than the owner, and in that case the security problem comes first.
A forum, a comments section or a profile page being used by somebody else. Fixed by closing the hole and removing what came through it.
Markup describing something the page does not show: review stars on a page with no reviews, an FAQ nobody can read. The fix is making the markup and the page agree, in either direction.
Serving Google something different from the visitor. Almost always a compromise or a plugin, rarely deliberate, and usually accompanied by traffic going somewhere it should not.
Search Console, Security and Manual Actions. If it says "No issues detected", you do not have a penalty and nothing below applies to you. This one step separates the two situations and most people never take it.
Find the exact day traffic fell in Search Console, then compare it against what you changed and against the confirmed update dates. A fall on the day of a redesign is a redesign problem. A fall spread over two weeks is usually an update. A fall on one page is usually that page.
Manual actions name their reason and their scope: site-wide or partial. A partial action affects some URLs, which is why traffic can fall without disappearing. Fixing the wrong scope wastes the attempt.
A reconsideration request is read by a person who can see what you have done. Removing half the bought links and asking is worse than not asking, because the refusal makes the next attempt harder and slower.
Which links, who was contacted, what was removed, what was disavowed, what changed on the site. The request is judged on evidence of work rather than on the apology.
What happened, how it happened, what you have done, and what you have changed so it does not happen again. Do not argue that the action was unfair even if you believe it. The reviewer is deciding whether the problem is gone.
Days to a few weeks depending on the type. Repeat submissions do not speed it up. A refusal usually names what remains, and that is the next thing to fix rather than an invitation to argue.
Revoking an action removes the suppression; it does not restore rankings that were being held up by the thing that caused it. If the traffic came from bought links, some of it is not coming back, and anybody telling you otherwise is selling something.
The first thing we do is tell you which of the two you have, and if it is the second one we say so rather than selling you a recovery for a problem that does not exist. Nobody can guarantee a manual action is revoked, and anybody who does is describing something they do not control.
There is no package to pick from. What the site needs is decided on a call and written down before any work starts, because a business with one location and a clean site needs a different month to an agency reselling to twelve clients.
01
Thirty minutes on what you sell, where you sell it, and what the site looks like today. No scope is written before that conversation, because the right work depends on all three.
02
What will be done, in what order, and what it costs, in writing. Nothing starts until you have agreed to it.
03
The work runs monthly and the scope changes as the site does. Cancel with 30 days’ notice.
Strictly, a manual action: a human reviewer at Google has looked at your site, decided it breaks a specific guideline, and applied a suppression that is listed in Search Console under Security and Manual Actions. Everything else people call a penalty is an algorithmic decline, which is not a penalty and is not lifted by asking.
Search Console, Security and Manual Actions. If it says no issues detected, you do not have one. That takes thirty seconds and it is the difference between two completely different problems with two completely different fixes.
A manual action is a decision by a person, it is disclosed to you, and it is lifted by fixing the cause and requesting reconsideration. An algorithmic drop is your pages being ranked lower than they were, it is never announced, there is nobody to appeal to, and it is recovered by making the pages genuinely better than what now outranks them.
Once the cause is genuinely fixed, a reconsideration request usually takes days to a few weeks. Recovery from an algorithmic decline has no timetable at all, because there is nothing to approve; it moves when the next assessment finds the site better than it was.
No. A human at Google decides, and requests do fail. What can be done is identifying the right cause, fixing it completely, and making the request once with the evidence attached, which is what most failed attempts are missing.
Not to Google, and yes to the work. The action attaches to the site whoever caused it, so ownership of the mistake is irrelevant to the fix. It matters for the work because you need to know what was done, and a previous supplier rarely volunteers it, so the link profile has to be read rather than asked about.
No, and the two get confused constantly. A suspension removes your listing from the map and has its own appeal process. A manual action affects your website in the ordinary search results. A business can have either, or both, and they are fixed separately.
A 30-minute call in your working hours. Tell us what you sell and where, and we will tell you what we would do first and what it involves. Prefer email? Send your website through the form and the Passieon Team will reply within two working days.
Message us
Ask anything about your site or where your enquiries are going. It goes straight to a person, not a bot. Leave an email and you get a reply.