Health is the subject Google is most careful about, because bad information here does real harm. That has a practical consequence nobody can work around: who wrote a page, what their qualifications are, and whether the practice is a verifiable organisation count for more in this market than in any other. A page that would rank fine for a plumber will not rank for a clinic.
The competition is not the practice down the road. It is Healthgrades, Zocdoc, WebMD and the insurer directories, which hold an entry for every practitioner in the country and have authority no practice will ever match. You do not beat them on their ground. You beat them on the four things they cannot know: which insurers you take, how soon somebody can be seen, what you actually treat, and who the patient will be sitting in front of.
Full name, qualifications, registration number where it is public, years in practice, conditions treated, languages. This is the page a directory cannot beat, because it is guessing at half of what you can simply state, and it is where the referral searches land.
Which plans you accept, by name, and whether you are taking new patients. Two of the most searched qualifiers in medical local search, answered by almost no practice site and by no directory correctly.
What the condition is, when it needs a doctor, what an appointment involves. Written for a worried reader, reviewed by a named clinician, and dated. Unsigned medical content starts at a disadvantage it rarely recovers from.
Dermatologist, Paediatrician, Family Practice Physician and the rest are separate Google categories appearing in separate map results. A practice filed under the generic Doctor competes with every clinic in the city for everything.
Every review replied to, none of them confirming that the reviewer is a patient and none of them touching anything clinical. One careless reply in this category is a regulatory problem, not a marketing one.
Medical listings are duplicated more than any other category, across insurer directories, hospital affiliations and review sites. Every inconsistency suppresses you, and most practices have listings they have never seen.
The work is the same everywhere; what people search and what the results look like are not. These have their own pages.
Every number below is from the client’s own Google Search Console, for the period shown. Impressions are how often the site appeared; clicks are people who arrived. What each visit is worth is your sales process, not ours, so these are the visits we can prove rather than a conversion figure we cannot.
+139,355% clicks against the previous period of the same length.
+2,059% clicks against the previous period of the same length.
+1,184% clicks against the previous period of the same length.
+1,174% clicks against the previous period of the same length.
There is no package to pick from. What the site needs is decided on a call and written down before any work starts, because a business with one location and a clean site needs a different month to an agency reselling to twelve clients.
01
Thirty minutes on what you sell, where you sell it, and what the site looks like today. No scope is written before that conversation, because the right work depends on all three.
02
What will be done, in what order, and what it costs, in writing. Nothing starts until you have agreed to it.
03
The work runs monthly and the scope changes as the site does. Cancel with 30 days’ notice.
Google applies a higher bar to subjects where poor information can cause harm. In practice that means named, qualified authors, verifiable organisation details and dated reviews of clinical content matter far more here. It also means the competition is national directories rather than local practices.
On their ground, rarely. On yours, routinely: which insurers you take, how soon a patient can be seen, who they will actually see, and what you treat. The directories cannot answer any of those correctly and they never will.
They should review and be named on anything clinical, which is usually an hour rather than a day. Drafting can be done for them. An unsigned medical page is held to a standard it cannot meet.
Not if it is done properly, and the risk is almost entirely in review replies. Nothing we publish confirms that anybody is a patient or refers to any care, and every reply goes to you before it is posted.
Yes, and mostly in the profile work. Each location needs its own verified profile pointing at its own page, with its own reviews, because reviews attach to a listing and cannot be pooled at head office.
A 30-minute call in your working hours. Tell us what you sell and where, and we will tell you what we would do first and what it involves. Prefer email? Send your website through the form and the Passieon Team will reply within two working days.
Message us
Ask anything about your site or where your enquiries are going. It goes straight to a person, not a bot. Leave an email and you get a reply.
