A practice area list instead of practice area pages
Twelve areas named on one page ranks for none of them. Each area you actually want needs its own page or it is not competing.
Guide
The whole method for a law practice, written out. Practice areas, the questions clients actually type, attorney pages that beat the directories, the local half, and the advertising rules that shape every line of it.
Free to read. Nothing claims a result and nothing quotes a fee.
Legal search has the widest gap between volume and value anywhere in local search. A term with forty searches a month can be worth more than one with four thousand in another trade, because a single matter can be worth several thousand in fees. Every decision below follows from that. Depth on one practice area beats breadth across twelve. A page that turns away the wrong enquiry is doing its job. Chasing volume is the mistake.
The second difference is that clients search the problem, not the profession. Almost nobody types "lawyer". They type what happens if they are hurt at work, how long they have to file, whether they can be dismissed for something, what happens to the house. A firm that has answered the question is the firm they ring. A firm with a practice area list is not in the conversation yet.
The third is that the rules constrain the writing. Legal advertising is regulated, the rules differ by jurisdiction, and they are yours rather than ours. Nothing in this guide requires claiming a result, naming a figure or implying a typical outcome, and if any of it conflicts with your bar, your bar wins.
Not all of them. A firm that lists twelve areas and wants two is spreading its own authority across ten pages it does not care about, and every one of those pages competes for attention with the two that matter. Pick the matters worth taking.
Then build a page for each one, and make it deep rather than wide. A personal injury page that explains what happens in the first week, what evidence matters, what the insurer will do, how long it takes and what the client has to decide, beats five pages that each say the firm is experienced and compassionate.
The test for whether a practice area page is finished is simple: could a prospective client read it and know what the next four weeks of their life look like? Almost no law firm page passes it.
This is the single highest-value thing on the list and it is the one most firms skip, because it does not look like marketing. The searches that bring instructions are questions: how long do I have, do I need a lawyer for this, what will happen to my licence, can they do that.
A page per question, naming the practice area inside it, connects what the client typed with what you do. It also reaches them earlier than a category page, which is when the decision is actually made rather than confirmed.
It feels like giving advice away. It is not. Somebody who has read a clear answer from you and then decided they need help is a better instruction than somebody who found a list of services.
Clients search a named attorney after a referral, constantly, and the bar directories outrank firms on those names almost every time. Avvo, Justia, Martindale and the state bar all hold a profile for your partners, and all of them are thin.
A proper page per attorney takes that search back: admissions and jurisdictions, practice areas, years in practice, education, notable involvement, a photograph, and a direct line or a way to request them specifically. Not a paragraph on a combined team page.
Check it yourself before you believe it matters. Search each partner by name plus your city. If a directory is above your own site, that is traffic you have already earned going somewhere else.
Every prospective client wants to know how they will pay, and almost no firm site says anything at all. Contingency against hourly against fixed, what a retainer is for, what happens to costs if the matter does not proceed, whether the consultation is free and what it covers.
None of that requires publishing a rate. Explaining the structure answers the question that stops people ringing, and a client who understands the arrangement before the call is a shorter, better call.
For most firms a large share of instructions start in the map pack, which means the Google Business Profile does more work than the website. Set the category to the practice area rather than the generic Lawyer, because the map results are filtered by category before anything else happens. Give each office its own profile. Keep the hours, the address and the phone number identical everywhere they appear.
Reviews need care that other trades do not. In several jurisdictions confirming in a public reply that somebody was a client is itself a problem, which is why most firms reply badly or not at all. Thank them, do not confirm the representation, do not touch the matter, and give a private route if something needs resolving.
City and neighbourhood pages are worth building only where you genuinely work and can be instructed. A page for a city you have no connection to is a doorway page, and it will not rank.
Most law firm sites are built on a template and have the same three faults: pages buried four clicks from the home page, a bio section that is one page for the whole team, and a blog nobody has touched since it was installed. None of those needs a rebuild.
Check that every practice area and attorney page is linked from somewhere a crawler can follow. Check the site loads quickly on a phone, because that is how the urgent searches arrive. Check nothing important is behind a form or a script. Then stop: technical work on a legal site has a low ceiling and the content work does not.
Rankings are not the measure and neither is traffic. The measures are consultations booked, by practice area, and how many of them were matters you actually wanted. A firm whose enquiries doubled and whose instructions did not has a page attracting the wrong people, which is a content problem rather than an SEO one.
Everything should be reported from accounts in the firm’s own name. Search Console, Analytics and the Business Profile belong to the firm, not to whoever is doing the work, so the data stays if the relationship does not.
Twelve areas named on one page ranks for none of them. Each area you actually want needs its own page or it is not competing.
"Personal injury lawyer [city]" is contested by firms with large budgets. The case-type and question searches are open, cheaper to win, and reach the client earlier.
Search your partners. If Avvo or the state bar outranks your own site, you are paying to send referrals somewhere else.
A problem under most advertising rules and a worse converter than an honest description of the process.
The question that stops the call, answerable in three paragraphs without a single number.
Commentary on a statutory change gets read by other lawyers. Answering what a client types gets read by clients.
The local half and the most valuable case type are written out separately, because each one is a different job rather than a paragraph of this one.
Everything above is work a firm can do itself, and the attorney pages alone are worth an afternoon of somebody’s time. When you want it taken on properly, this is what that looks like, scoped on a call before anything starts.
Yes, and unusually well, because the value per matter is high enough to justify effort on searches that would be uneconomic in most trades. What does not work is treating it like a general business: chasing the biggest city term, writing a services list, and publishing legal commentary instead of answering what clients ask.
Profile and review work can move the map pack in weeks. Practice area and question pages usually settle in two to four months. A contested city head term in a large market takes a year or more, which is why it should not be the first target.
Local SEO is the map pack half: the Google Business Profile, reviews, citations and the location pages. SEO for lawyers is everything, including the practice area pages, the question pages and the attorney pages that win searches with no location in them at all. Most firms need both and start with the local half because it moves faster.
Volume is the wrong measure here. A practice area with thirty searches a month and one matter worth several thousand in fees is a better page than a thousand searches worth nothing. Judge it by the value of the matter, not the count of the searches.
They vary by jurisdiction and they are yours, not ours. Nothing in this guide requires claiming a result, naming a specialisation you cannot support or publishing an outcome. Anything written for a firm should go to the firm before it is published.
An attorney should review anything substantive and be named on it. Drafting can be done for them, and usually is, but unsigned legal content is held to a standard it cannot meet and it reads that way to a client too.
A 30-minute call in your working hours. Tell us what you sell and where, and we will tell you what we would do first and what it involves. Prefer email? Send your website through the form and the Passieon Team will reply within two working days.
Message us
Ask anything about your site or where your enquiries are going. It goes straight to a person, not a bot. Leave an email and you get a reply.